Review



vertical vegetation structure  (Changbai Mountain Tourism Co Ltd)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Changbai Mountain Tourism Co Ltd vertical vegetation structure
    Species α ‐diversity of EPF at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent different <t>vegetation</t> belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05. Post hoc analysis using Dunn's pairwise comparisons identified significant differences as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
    Vertical Vegetation Structure, supplied by Changbai Mountain Tourism Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/vertical+vegetation+structure/vertical+vegetation+structure/pmc12213609-153-15-20
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    vertical vegetation structure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain"

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain

    Journal: Ecology and Evolution

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.71623

    Species α ‐diversity of EPF at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent different vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05. Post hoc analysis using Dunn's pairwise comparisons identified significant differences as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Species α ‐diversity of EPF at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent different vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05. Post hoc analysis using Dunn's pairwise comparisons identified significant differences as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used:

    β ‐Diversity of entomopathogenic fungal genera and species at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test identified significant differences at p < 0.05.
    Figure Legend Snippet: β ‐Diversity of entomopathogenic fungal genera and species at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test identified significant differences at p < 0.05.

    Techniques Used:

    Soil fungal community structure across different vegetation belts. The genus level indicates the genus structure of the EPF community, and the species level indicates the species structure of the EPF community. Vegetation belts are represented by different colors: A‐red (broad‐leaved forests), B‐cyan (mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests), C‐green (coniferous forests), D‐blue (Erman's birch forests), and E‐orange (alpine tundra). The R 2 values indicate the model fit. Significant differences in EPF groupings across vegetation belts were observed ( p < 0.001).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Soil fungal community structure across different vegetation belts. The genus level indicates the genus structure of the EPF community, and the species level indicates the species structure of the EPF community. Vegetation belts are represented by different colors: A‐red (broad‐leaved forests), B‐cyan (mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests), C‐green (coniferous forests), D‐blue (Erman's birch forests), and E‐orange (alpine tundra). The R 2 values indicate the model fit. Significant differences in EPF groupings across vegetation belts were observed ( p < 0.001).

    Techniques Used:

    Species composition and distribution of EPF in different vegetation belts. Colors represent different vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The numbers in the ellipses indicate the number of exclusive and shared species in the different vegetation belts, illustrating species composition.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Species composition and distribution of EPF in different vegetation belts. Colors represent different vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The numbers in the ellipses indicate the number of exclusive and shared species in the different vegetation belts, illustrating species composition.

    Techniques Used:

    Dominant species and evolutionary trends of EPF in vegetation belts. Concentric circles (inner to outer) represent taxonomic levels from phylum to species, with circle size proportional to abundance. Colors depict species variation across vegetation belts: Gray (no difference), red (broad‐leaved forests), blue (mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests), green (coniferous forests), and purple (alpine tundra). Letters denote species differing by vegetation belts, labeled on the right. Distribution histograms highlight species with LDA scores > 2. Bar colors correspond to vegetation belts, and bar lengths indicate the LDA scores, representing the degree of responsibility for significant differentiation.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Dominant species and evolutionary trends of EPF in vegetation belts. Concentric circles (inner to outer) represent taxonomic levels from phylum to species, with circle size proportional to abundance. Colors depict species variation across vegetation belts: Gray (no difference), red (broad‐leaved forests), blue (mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests), green (coniferous forests), and purple (alpine tundra). Letters denote species differing by vegetation belts, labeled on the right. Distribution histograms highlight species with LDA scores > 2. Bar colors correspond to vegetation belts, and bar lengths indicate the LDA scores, representing the degree of responsibility for significant differentiation.

    Techniques Used: Labeling

    Effects of soil environmental factors and shrub communities on EPF structure across vegetation belts. The lower‐left graph shows correlations between soil physicochemical properties and vegetation belts, and the upper‐right graph shows correlations between shrub taxa. Pearson's r test was used to assess correlations, with red indicating positive correlations, blue indicating negative correlations, and significance levels represented as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. The correlation strength between entomopathogenic fungal communities and soil physicochemical properties or shrub species in vegetation belts (A: Broad‐leaved forests; B: Mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests; C: Coniferous forests; D: Erman's birch forests; and E: Alpine tundra) is shown by black connecting lines. Thick lines represent moderate correlations (Mantel's R = 0.4–0.6), and thin lines indicate weaker correlations ( R < 0.4), with all correlations significant at p < 0.05.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of soil environmental factors and shrub communities on EPF structure across vegetation belts. The lower‐left graph shows correlations between soil physicochemical properties and vegetation belts, and the upper‐right graph shows correlations between shrub taxa. Pearson's r test was used to assess correlations, with red indicating positive correlations, blue indicating negative correlations, and significance levels represented as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. The correlation strength between entomopathogenic fungal communities and soil physicochemical properties or shrub species in vegetation belts (A: Broad‐leaved forests; B: Mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests; C: Coniferous forests; D: Erman's birch forests; and E: Alpine tundra) is shown by black connecting lines. Thick lines represent moderate correlations (Mantel's R = 0.4–0.6), and thin lines indicate weaker correlations ( R < 0.4), with all correlations significant at p < 0.05.

    Techniques Used:

    Intergroup distribution differences in EPF across vegetation belts. The clustering tree (right) uses branch colors to indicate EPF genera. The stacked bar chart (left) displays the relative abundance of EPF species across vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. Differences in EPF abundance between vegetation belts were evaluated using the Kruskal‐Wallis H test. Species with significant differences ( p < 0.05) are marked with red numbers.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Intergroup distribution differences in EPF across vegetation belts. The clustering tree (right) uses branch colors to indicate EPF genera. The stacked bar chart (left) displays the relative abundance of EPF species across vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. Differences in EPF abundance between vegetation belts were evaluated using the Kruskal‐Wallis H test. Species with significant differences ( p < 0.05) are marked with red numbers.

    Techniques Used:

    Related Articles

    Labeling:

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain
    Article Snippet: diagrams were used to compare the species composition of EPF across different vegetation belts. .. Partial correlation analysis examined the relationships between EPF and trees, shrubs, and herbs within the vertical vegetation structure of the Changbai Mountain. .. Multilevel species differences in EPF across samples were analyzed using LDA Effect Size (LEfSe).



    Similar Products

    vertical vegetation structure  (Changbai Mountain Tourism Co Ltd)
    90
    Changbai Mountain Tourism Co Ltd vertical vegetation structure
    Species α ‐diversity of EPF at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent different <t>vegetation</t> belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05. Post hoc analysis using Dunn's pairwise comparisons identified significant differences as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
    Vertical Vegetation Structure, supplied by Changbai Mountain Tourism Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/vertical+vegetation+structure/vertical+vegetation+structure/pmc12213609-153-15-20
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    vertical vegetation structure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Species α ‐diversity of EPF at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent different vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05. Post hoc analysis using Dunn's pairwise comparisons identified significant differences as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Ecology and Evolution

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.71623

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Species α ‐diversity of EPF at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent different vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05. Post hoc analysis using Dunn's pairwise comparisons identified significant differences as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Partial correlation analysis examined the relationships between EPF and trees, shrubs, and herbs within the vertical vegetation structure of the Changbai Mountain.

    Techniques:

    β ‐Diversity of entomopathogenic fungal genera and species at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test identified significant differences at p < 0.05.

    Journal: Ecology and Evolution

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.71623

    Figure Lengend Snippet: β ‐Diversity of entomopathogenic fungal genera and species at different altitudes. Boxplots of various colors represent vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The Kruskal–Wallis H ‐test identified significant differences at p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: Partial correlation analysis examined the relationships between EPF and trees, shrubs, and herbs within the vertical vegetation structure of the Changbai Mountain.

    Techniques:

    Soil fungal community structure across different vegetation belts. The genus level indicates the genus structure of the EPF community, and the species level indicates the species structure of the EPF community. Vegetation belts are represented by different colors: A‐red (broad‐leaved forests), B‐cyan (mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests), C‐green (coniferous forests), D‐blue (Erman's birch forests), and E‐orange (alpine tundra). The R 2 values indicate the model fit. Significant differences in EPF groupings across vegetation belts were observed ( p < 0.001).

    Journal: Ecology and Evolution

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.71623

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Soil fungal community structure across different vegetation belts. The genus level indicates the genus structure of the EPF community, and the species level indicates the species structure of the EPF community. Vegetation belts are represented by different colors: A‐red (broad‐leaved forests), B‐cyan (mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests), C‐green (coniferous forests), D‐blue (Erman's birch forests), and E‐orange (alpine tundra). The R 2 values indicate the model fit. Significant differences in EPF groupings across vegetation belts were observed ( p < 0.001).

    Article Snippet: Partial correlation analysis examined the relationships between EPF and trees, shrubs, and herbs within the vertical vegetation structure of the Changbai Mountain.

    Techniques:

    Species composition and distribution of EPF in different vegetation belts. Colors represent different vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The numbers in the ellipses indicate the number of exclusive and shared species in the different vegetation belts, illustrating species composition.

    Journal: Ecology and Evolution

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.71623

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Species composition and distribution of EPF in different vegetation belts. Colors represent different vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. The numbers in the ellipses indicate the number of exclusive and shared species in the different vegetation belts, illustrating species composition.

    Article Snippet: Partial correlation analysis examined the relationships between EPF and trees, shrubs, and herbs within the vertical vegetation structure of the Changbai Mountain.

    Techniques:

    Dominant species and evolutionary trends of EPF in vegetation belts. Concentric circles (inner to outer) represent taxonomic levels from phylum to species, with circle size proportional to abundance. Colors depict species variation across vegetation belts: Gray (no difference), red (broad‐leaved forests), blue (mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests), green (coniferous forests), and purple (alpine tundra). Letters denote species differing by vegetation belts, labeled on the right. Distribution histograms highlight species with LDA scores > 2. Bar colors correspond to vegetation belts, and bar lengths indicate the LDA scores, representing the degree of responsibility for significant differentiation.

    Journal: Ecology and Evolution

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.71623

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Dominant species and evolutionary trends of EPF in vegetation belts. Concentric circles (inner to outer) represent taxonomic levels from phylum to species, with circle size proportional to abundance. Colors depict species variation across vegetation belts: Gray (no difference), red (broad‐leaved forests), blue (mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests), green (coniferous forests), and purple (alpine tundra). Letters denote species differing by vegetation belts, labeled on the right. Distribution histograms highlight species with LDA scores > 2. Bar colors correspond to vegetation belts, and bar lengths indicate the LDA scores, representing the degree of responsibility for significant differentiation.

    Article Snippet: Partial correlation analysis examined the relationships between EPF and trees, shrubs, and herbs within the vertical vegetation structure of the Changbai Mountain.

    Techniques: Labeling

    Effects of soil environmental factors and shrub communities on EPF structure across vegetation belts. The lower‐left graph shows correlations between soil physicochemical properties and vegetation belts, and the upper‐right graph shows correlations between shrub taxa. Pearson's r test was used to assess correlations, with red indicating positive correlations, blue indicating negative correlations, and significance levels represented as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. The correlation strength between entomopathogenic fungal communities and soil physicochemical properties or shrub species in vegetation belts (A: Broad‐leaved forests; B: Mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests; C: Coniferous forests; D: Erman's birch forests; and E: Alpine tundra) is shown by black connecting lines. Thick lines represent moderate correlations (Mantel's R = 0.4–0.6), and thin lines indicate weaker correlations ( R < 0.4), with all correlations significant at p < 0.05.

    Journal: Ecology and Evolution

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.71623

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of soil environmental factors and shrub communities on EPF structure across vegetation belts. The lower‐left graph shows correlations between soil physicochemical properties and vegetation belts, and the upper‐right graph shows correlations between shrub taxa. Pearson's r test was used to assess correlations, with red indicating positive correlations, blue indicating negative correlations, and significance levels represented as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. The correlation strength between entomopathogenic fungal communities and soil physicochemical properties or shrub species in vegetation belts (A: Broad‐leaved forests; B: Mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests; C: Coniferous forests; D: Erman's birch forests; and E: Alpine tundra) is shown by black connecting lines. Thick lines represent moderate correlations (Mantel's R = 0.4–0.6), and thin lines indicate weaker correlations ( R < 0.4), with all correlations significant at p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: Partial correlation analysis examined the relationships between EPF and trees, shrubs, and herbs within the vertical vegetation structure of the Changbai Mountain.

    Techniques:

    Intergroup distribution differences in EPF across vegetation belts. The clustering tree (right) uses branch colors to indicate EPF genera. The stacked bar chart (left) displays the relative abundance of EPF species across vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. Differences in EPF abundance between vegetation belts were evaluated using the Kruskal‐Wallis H test. Species with significant differences ( p < 0.05) are marked with red numbers.

    Journal: Ecology and Evolution

    Article Title: Vertical Zonal Distribution Patterns of Entomopathogenic Fungi in the Changbai Mountain

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.71623

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Intergroup distribution differences in EPF across vegetation belts. The clustering tree (right) uses branch colors to indicate EPF genera. The stacked bar chart (left) displays the relative abundance of EPF species across vegetation belts: (A) broad‐leaved forests, (B) mixed coniferous and broad‐leaved forests, (C) coniferous forests, (D) Erman's birch forests, and (E) alpine tundra. Differences in EPF abundance between vegetation belts were evaluated using the Kruskal‐Wallis H test. Species with significant differences ( p < 0.05) are marked with red numbers.

    Article Snippet: Partial correlation analysis examined the relationships between EPF and trees, shrubs, and herbs within the vertical vegetation structure of the Changbai Mountain.

    Techniques: